I wrote in the title deliberately ecclesiastical faith, because I have now learned that between the Christian faith and that which promotes the church, a Discrepancy exist.
In various forums I met nude again and again Christians, who are also naturists. So have nudity and belief in God but do not exclude, as required by the Church, especially the Roman Catholic.
After a few days in the jungle, there were also the first encounter with indigenous people (one woman and one man), apparently had never seen other people. They were both stark naked. After they had overcome their skepticism about these strange people dressed a little, there was first contact with the expedition team. A woman of the team had to do nothing more urgent than the bare immediately attract a Native clothes. Curious as she was, she let it happen. The next day, the two again, of course, both naked again. Apparently, it liked the woman do not walk around in clothes. I can understand that.
Then came a male expedition members (same aboriginal and until recently walked around naked in the jungle) and wanted the man to miss clothes on the ground, and now the Hammer, "that his nakedness for him was an unbearable sight.
Hello? Have they missed the brainwashed?
can Why can not the church these people live in peace as they are accustomed, naked and with nature? Why is the church always says to have these people impose their beliefs and unrealistic worldview? Why says the so-called civilized man, to which the church representatives are also appeared to yes, always, "civilize" these people need? And why should a man in the eyes of the church not to be naked? What is it sinful?
anyway I wonder who is more civilized? The "uncivilized" Native living naked in the jungle and takes only the nature of what he needs to live, or the "civilized" man in the pinstripe suit, out of sheer greed for money and power of nature and thus ruining the world?
has at least not this expedition to re-educate these people to textile fetishist, because the two have not led the expedition to their tribe and have not come back. Maybe the thing to them was too stupid to be constantly forced into clothes.
necked greetings
Michael
can Why can not the church these people live in peace as they are accustomed, naked and with nature? Why is the church always says to have these people impose their beliefs and unrealistic worldview? Why says the so-called civilized man, to which the church representatives are also appeared to yes, always, "civilize" these people need? And why should a man in the eyes of the church not to be naked? What is it sinful?
anyway I wonder who is more civilized? The "uncivilized" Native living naked in the jungle and takes only the nature of what he needs to live, or the "civilized" man in the pinstripe suit, out of sheer greed for money and power of nature and thus ruining the world?
has at least not this expedition to re-educate these people to textile fetishist, because the two have not led the expedition to their tribe and have not come back. Maybe the thing to them was too stupid to be constantly forced into clothes.
necked greetings
Michael
0 comments:
Post a Comment